King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4......... d5
Chessiverse AB
Date: 7 hours ago
City: Remote
Contract type: Full time
Remote
Articles/Opening Guides/King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4...... d5
King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4...... d5
Feb 24, 2028
TL;DR
The Modern Defence: Black returns the pawn for easy development. After 4.exd5 the f-pawn will fall back, but Black gets active piece play and a comfortable structure rather than a desperate attempt to cling to material.
Reviewed by
IM John BartholomewCo-Founder & Chess Educator
International Master and chess educator. Co-founded Chessable and joined Chessiverse as co-founder. Best known for his "Climbing the Rating Ladder" YouTube series and structured opening courses.
Summary
The King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4... d5 begins with 1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 d5 (ECO C36). Black hits the centre instead of clinging to the extra pawn, prioritising development and active piece play over material.
Strategic Overview
The Modern Defence is a strategic answer to the King's Gambit. Instead of trying to hold the f4 pawn at all costs, Black throws ...d5 into the centre, attacks e4, and accepts that the material edge may evaporate in exchange for a comfortable, well-developed position. Many continuations transpose into Falkbeer-flavoured structures or into the main King's Gambit Accepted lines by a different move order, but the strategic point is the same: Black trades pawn count for easy development and piece activity. White typically takes on d5, and the resulting positions feature open files, active minor pieces for both sides, and a clear structural fight rather than a tactical one. The f4 pawn often returns to White at the right moment, leaving roughly material parity but with a structure that depends on who handled the central trades better. In some lines Black has to play actively just to keep the f4 pawn alive; in others Black gives it back voluntarily and uses the time gained to outdevelop White. Practically, the Modern Defence is what experienced players choose when they do not want to spend twenty moves defending a King's Gambit ending. It is principled, sound, and avoids the wildest tactical lines without making any structural concessions.
Key Ideas
When players succeed in this line, they usually do so by leaning on the following themes:
It arises from the King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4... 3.Nf3. On the White side, Joseph G Gallagher (8 games), Mark L Hebden (7 games), Richard S Jones (6 games) top the database. Notable Black exponents: Timothy J Upton (6 games), Boris Alexander Latzke (5 games), Stefan Walter (5 games).
Performance Across Rating Levels
The picture changes a lot as you climb the rating ladder. At 1200 Elo, the opening shows up in 0.04% of games (302,858 samples). White scores 53.5%, Black 43.4%, draws 3.1%. At 1800 the opening surfaces in 0.11% of games; White wins 49.9%, Black 46.2%, draws 4%. At the top end (2500+ Elo), popularity is 0.02% with 8.8% draws — a clear sign of how much theory rules the line at master level. White's edge erodes by 6.1pp from 1200 to 2500 Elo, suggesting Black's counterplay is easier to find with experience.
Time Control Patterns
Look at the same opening across time controls and blitz stands out. In bullet, it appears in 0.04% of games (973,999); White wins 50.2%. Blitz shows 0.07% adoption across 2,653,884 games, White scoring 51%. In rapid, the share rises to 0.07% — 746,076 games, White 52.8%. White's score swings 2.6pp across formats, so time control isn't just a stylistic choice here — it shifts the actual results.
Move Diversity and Theory Depth
Move choice is far from uniform in the King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4... d5. At 1200 Elo, the top reply is exd5, played 46.2% of the time. There are 5 other moves seeing meaningful share, and 82.4% of games stick to established theory. Entropy: 2.22. By 2500, exd5 dominates at 91.7% of replies; only 2 viable alternatives remain and 99.4% of moves are theory. Entropy drops to 0.50. The narrowing is significant — strong players consolidate around a small set of best moves, while amateurs scatter across many plausible-looking options.
Historical Trends
Long-term, the trajectory of this opening is informative. Adoption peaked in 2014 at 0.12% (10,527 games). By 2025 it sits at 0.07% — a 42% shift overall, leaving the line in decline.
Common Mistakes
Ready to try the King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4... d5 against a bot? Pick an opponent at your level and play a game.
Quick Facts
Main Line1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 d5
DifficultyIntermediate
Parent OpeningKing's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4... 3.Nf3
Style
Gambiteers sacrifice material early for rapid development and initiative. These openings often lead to sharp, tactical positions where the attacking side must strike quickly before the opponent consolidates.
3,399,960games on Lichess
51.4%
3.7%
45%
White wins Draws Black wins
Top Players
As White
Most Popular At1800
SharpnessVery Sharp
Popularity by Rating
Percentage of all games at each rating bracket that feature this opening.
Data from Lichess opening explorer (blitz & rapid games)
Theory Adherence by Rating
How often players choose the single most popular move at this position. Higher = more predictable play.
White to move after the opening line
Popularity Over Time
Share of all Lichess blitz + rapid games featuring this opening, by year.
Top Moves by Rating
White to move after the opening line
RatingMost Popular2nd3rd
400exd526.1%e519.7%Nc318.2%
1000exd535.6%e524.7%Nc313.3%
1200exd546.2%e527.5%Nc38.7%
1400exd555.1%e529.3%Nc34.8%
1600exd561.5%e529.3%Nc32.5%
1800exd566.6%e527.7%Nc31.8%
2000exd570.4%e525.6%Nc31.6%
2200exd580.7%e516.9%Nc31.1%
2500exd591.7%e56.8%Nc30.9%
Popularity by Time Control
Bullet
0.04%974K
Blitz
0.07%2.7M
Rapid
0.07%746K
2% more decisive in bullet
Raw data tables (Lichess blitz + rapid)
King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4...... d5: popularity and win rates by player rating Rating (Elo) Share % Games White win % Black win % Draw % Sharpness 400 0.01 34,540 50.3 45.9 3.8 0.962 1000 0.03 123,467 52.0 44.6 3.3 0.967 1200 0.04 302,858 53.5 43.4 3.1 0.969 1400 0.07 608,690 53.9 43.0 3.1 0.969 1600 0.09 936,473 52.5 44.1 3.4 0.966 1800 0.11 928,575 49.9 46.2 4.0 0.960 2000 0.09 395,182 47.4 48.0 4.6 0.954 2200 0.04 68,024 46.3 47.8 5.8 0.942 2500 0.02 2,151 47.4 43.8 8.8 0.912 King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4...... d5: move-choice theory adherence by rating Rating (Elo) Top move Top move % Viable moves Theory % Entropy 400 exd5 26.1 5 64.0 2.835 1000 exd5 35.6 5 73.5 2.566 1200 exd5 46.2 5 82.4 2.216 1400 exd5 55.1 2 89.2 1.829 1600 exd5 61.5 2 93.3 1.515 1800 exd5 66.6 2 96.1 1.288 2000 exd5 70.4 2 97.7 1.135 2200 exd5 80.7 2 98.7 0.865 2500 exd5 91.7 2 99.4 0.503 King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4...... d5: popularity over time Year Share % Games White win % Black win % Draw % 2013 0.11 3,222 58.2 39.2 2.6 2014 0.12 10,527 55.3 41.5 3.2 2015 0.11 25,215 54.0 42.9 3.1 2016 0.11 66,985 53.6 42.9 3.5 2017 0.10 116,260 52.1 44.2 3.6 2018 0.09 166,676 51.5 44.8 3.7 2019 0.08 236,495 51.6 44.8 3.6 2020 0.07 426,596 51.4 44.7 3.9 2021 0.07 528,148 51.3 45.0 3.7 2022 0.07 530,171 51.3 45.1 3.6 2023 0.07 543,484 51.1 45.2 3.7 2024 0.07 510,831 50.9 45.4 3.6 2025 0.07 485,229 51.2 45.2 3.6 King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4...... d5: popularity by time control Format Share % Games White win % Black win % Draw % Sharpness bullet 0.04 973,999 50.2 47.4 2.4 0.976 blitz 0.07 2,653,884 51.0 45.4 3.6 0.964 rapid 0.07 746,076 52.8 43.4 3.9 0.961 King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4...... d5: top candidate moves by rating bracket Rating (Elo) 1st move 1st % 2nd move 2nd % 3rd move 3rd % 400 exd5 26.1 e5 19.7 Nc3 18.2 1000 exd5 35.6 e5 24.7 Nc3 13.3 1200 exd5 46.2 e5 27.5 Nc3 8.7 1400 exd5 55.1 e5 29.3 Nc3 4.8 1600 exd5 61.5 e5 29.3 Nc3 2.5 1800 exd5 66.6 e5 27.7 Nc3 1.8 2000 exd5 70.4 e5 25.6 Nc3 1.6 2200 exd5 80.7 e5 16.9 Nc3 1.1 2500 exd5 91.7 e5 6.8 Nc3 0.9 King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4...... d5: top practitioners by side Side Player Games White Joseph G Gallagher 8 White Mark L Hebden 7 White Richard S Jones 6 Black Timothy J Upton 6 Black Boris Alexander Latzke 5 Black Stefan Walter 5
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4... d5?
The King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4... d5 begins with 1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 d5 and is classified under ECO code C36. Black attacks the e4 pawn for initiative and easier development overall than White.
Is the King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4... d5 good for beginners?
The King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4... d5 can be played at any level. Beginners should focus on understanding the key strategic ideas rather than memorizing long theoretical lines. Our AI bots at various rating levels provide a great way to practice the opening concepts.
What are the win rates for the King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4... d5?
In a database of 3,399,960 master games, White wins 51.4% of the time, Black wins 45%, and 3.7% are drawn. Notable players on the White side include Joseph G Gallagher and Mark L Hebden. On the Black side, Timothy J Upton and Boris Alexander Latzke are among the most frequent practitioners.
How can I practice the King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4... d5?
On Chessiverse, you can practice the King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4... d5 by playing against our 600+ AI bots. Each bot has a unique playing style and opening repertoire, so you can find the perfect sparring partner for any level.
Related Openings
Evans Gambit
Evans Gambit: 4.b4 sacrifices a wing pawn for fast development and a powerful c3-d4 centre. White scores 52.7% across 5.8M games. Play vs. AI on Chessiverse.
Evans Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3...... Ba5
Evans Accepted 5...Ba5: most principled retreat, keeps eye on c3. White builds the d4 centre and launches an attack. 1.5M games. Play vs. AI on Chessiverse.
King's Gambit
King's Gambit (2.f4): the great romantic gambit. Pawn sacrificed for open lines and a direct king hunt from move three. Play vs. AI on Chessiverse.
King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4...... 3.Nf3
King's Knight Gambit: 3.Nf3 stops ...Qh4+ and prepares to recover the f4 pawn. The principled main line, 30M games of theory. Play vs. AI on Chessiverse.
Reviewed by
IM John BartholomewCo-Founder & Chess Educator
International Master and chess educator. Co-founded Chessable and joined Chessiverse as co-founder. Best known for his "Climbing the Rating Ladder" YouTube series and structured opening courses.
Practice This Opening on Chessiverse
Play against 1000+ AI bots with unique personalities and opening repertoires. From beginner-friendly to grandmaster-level opponents, find the perfect sparring partner for any opening.
Play Now
Not sure which opening fits you? Take the free chess personality test — your style determines which openings will work with you.
Back to Articles
King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4...... d5
- 42%
Feb 24, 2028
TL;DR
The Modern Defence: Black returns the pawn for easy development. After 4.exd5 the f-pawn will fall back, but Black gets active piece play and a comfortable structure rather than a desperate attempt to cling to material.
Reviewed by
IM John BartholomewCo-Founder & Chess Educator
International Master and chess educator. Co-founded Chessable and joined Chessiverse as co-founder. Best known for his "Climbing the Rating Ladder" YouTube series and structured opening courses.
Summary
The King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4... d5 begins with 1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 d5 (ECO C36). Black hits the centre instead of clinging to the extra pawn, prioritising development and active piece play over material.
Strategic Overview
The Modern Defence is a strategic answer to the King's Gambit. Instead of trying to hold the f4 pawn at all costs, Black throws ...d5 into the centre, attacks e4, and accepts that the material edge may evaporate in exchange for a comfortable, well-developed position. Many continuations transpose into Falkbeer-flavoured structures or into the main King's Gambit Accepted lines by a different move order, but the strategic point is the same: Black trades pawn count for easy development and piece activity. White typically takes on d5, and the resulting positions feature open files, active minor pieces for both sides, and a clear structural fight rather than a tactical one. The f4 pawn often returns to White at the right moment, leaving roughly material parity but with a structure that depends on who handled the central trades better. In some lines Black has to play actively just to keep the f4 pawn alive; in others Black gives it back voluntarily and uses the time gained to outdevelop White. Practically, the Modern Defence is what experienced players choose when they do not want to spend twenty moves defending a King's Gambit ending. It is principled, sound, and avoids the wildest tactical lines without making any structural concessions.
Key Ideas
When players succeed in this line, they usually do so by leaning on the following themes:
- Trade material edge for development — ...d5 prioritises a healthy structure and quick development over holding the f4 pawn. The pawn often returns to White anyway, but Black has the better-coordinated army.
- Hits e4 immediately — By striking at e4, Black forces White to make a central decision rather than carry out the planned d4 and Bxf4 plan unchallenged.
- Transposes around modern theory — Lines often blend into Falkbeer-style positions or modern King's Gambit Accepted main lines. Knowing the related structures is more important than memorising deep theory.
- Active defence keeps the pawn alive in some lines — Some sub-variations let Black hold the f4 pawn, but only with precise, active play. The strategic premise stays the same: piece activity over pawn count.
It arises from the King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4... 3.Nf3. On the White side, Joseph G Gallagher (8 games), Mark L Hebden (7 games), Richard S Jones (6 games) top the database. Notable Black exponents: Timothy J Upton (6 games), Boris Alexander Latzke (5 games), Stefan Walter (5 games).
Performance Across Rating Levels
The picture changes a lot as you climb the rating ladder. At 1200 Elo, the opening shows up in 0.04% of games (302,858 samples). White scores 53.5%, Black 43.4%, draws 3.1%. At 1800 the opening surfaces in 0.11% of games; White wins 49.9%, Black 46.2%, draws 4%. At the top end (2500+ Elo), popularity is 0.02% with 8.8% draws — a clear sign of how much theory rules the line at master level. White's edge erodes by 6.1pp from 1200 to 2500 Elo, suggesting Black's counterplay is easier to find with experience.
Time Control Patterns
Look at the same opening across time controls and blitz stands out. In bullet, it appears in 0.04% of games (973,999); White wins 50.2%. Blitz shows 0.07% adoption across 2,653,884 games, White scoring 51%. In rapid, the share rises to 0.07% — 746,076 games, White 52.8%. White's score swings 2.6pp across formats, so time control isn't just a stylistic choice here — it shifts the actual results.
Move Diversity and Theory Depth
Move choice is far from uniform in the King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4... d5. At 1200 Elo, the top reply is exd5, played 46.2% of the time. There are 5 other moves seeing meaningful share, and 82.4% of games stick to established theory. Entropy: 2.22. By 2500, exd5 dominates at 91.7% of replies; only 2 viable alternatives remain and 99.4% of moves are theory. Entropy drops to 0.50. The narrowing is significant — strong players consolidate around a small set of best moves, while amateurs scatter across many plausible-looking options.
Historical Trends
Long-term, the trajectory of this opening is informative. Adoption peaked in 2014 at 0.12% (10,527 games). By 2025 it sits at 0.07% — a 42% shift overall, leaving the line in decline.
Common Mistakes
- Drifting away from main theory — At 400 Elo, theory adherence sits at 64% — versus 97.7% at 2000. The most popular deviation is Nc3 (played 18.2% of the time at 400, much less so up top). It looks fine but quietly hands the better-prepared side an edge.
- Neglecting development — Extra pawn moves in the opening are tempting, especially when you "know the moves". Developing a piece each turn is the simple correction.
- Overextending the attack — Gambits look like permission to throw everything forward. They aren't — every attacking move should improve a piece. Random checks and threats burn the initiative once they fail to coordinate.
Ready to try the King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4... d5 against a bot? Pick an opponent at your level and play a game.
Quick Facts
Main Line1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 d5
DifficultyIntermediate
Parent OpeningKing's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4... 3.Nf3
Style
Gambiteers sacrifice material early for rapid development and initiative. These openings often lead to sharp, tactical positions where the attacking side must strike quickly before the opponent consolidates.
3,399,960games on Lichess
51.4%
3.7%
45%
White wins Draws Black wins
Top Players
As White
- Joseph G Gallagher8 games
- Mark L Hebden7 games
- Richard S Jones6 games
- Timothy J Upton6 games
- Boris Alexander Latzke5 games
- Stefan Walter5 games
Most Popular At1800
SharpnessVery Sharp
Popularity by Rating
Percentage of all games at each rating bracket that feature this opening.
Data from Lichess opening explorer (blitz & rapid games)
Theory Adherence by Rating
How often players choose the single most popular move at this position. Higher = more predictable play.
White to move after the opening line
Popularity Over Time
Share of all Lichess blitz + rapid games featuring this opening, by year.
Top Moves by Rating
White to move after the opening line
RatingMost Popular2nd3rd
400exd526.1%e519.7%Nc318.2%
1000exd535.6%e524.7%Nc313.3%
1200exd546.2%e527.5%Nc38.7%
1400exd555.1%e529.3%Nc34.8%
1600exd561.5%e529.3%Nc32.5%
1800exd566.6%e527.7%Nc31.8%
2000exd570.4%e525.6%Nc31.6%
2200exd580.7%e516.9%Nc31.1%
2500exd591.7%e56.8%Nc30.9%
Popularity by Time Control
Bullet
0.04%974K
Blitz
0.07%2.7M
Rapid
0.07%746K
2% more decisive in bullet
Raw data tables (Lichess blitz + rapid)
King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4...... d5: popularity and win rates by player rating Rating (Elo) Share % Games White win % Black win % Draw % Sharpness 400 0.01 34,540 50.3 45.9 3.8 0.962 1000 0.03 123,467 52.0 44.6 3.3 0.967 1200 0.04 302,858 53.5 43.4 3.1 0.969 1400 0.07 608,690 53.9 43.0 3.1 0.969 1600 0.09 936,473 52.5 44.1 3.4 0.966 1800 0.11 928,575 49.9 46.2 4.0 0.960 2000 0.09 395,182 47.4 48.0 4.6 0.954 2200 0.04 68,024 46.3 47.8 5.8 0.942 2500 0.02 2,151 47.4 43.8 8.8 0.912 King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4...... d5: move-choice theory adherence by rating Rating (Elo) Top move Top move % Viable moves Theory % Entropy 400 exd5 26.1 5 64.0 2.835 1000 exd5 35.6 5 73.5 2.566 1200 exd5 46.2 5 82.4 2.216 1400 exd5 55.1 2 89.2 1.829 1600 exd5 61.5 2 93.3 1.515 1800 exd5 66.6 2 96.1 1.288 2000 exd5 70.4 2 97.7 1.135 2200 exd5 80.7 2 98.7 0.865 2500 exd5 91.7 2 99.4 0.503 King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4...... d5: popularity over time Year Share % Games White win % Black win % Draw % 2013 0.11 3,222 58.2 39.2 2.6 2014 0.12 10,527 55.3 41.5 3.2 2015 0.11 25,215 54.0 42.9 3.1 2016 0.11 66,985 53.6 42.9 3.5 2017 0.10 116,260 52.1 44.2 3.6 2018 0.09 166,676 51.5 44.8 3.7 2019 0.08 236,495 51.6 44.8 3.6 2020 0.07 426,596 51.4 44.7 3.9 2021 0.07 528,148 51.3 45.0 3.7 2022 0.07 530,171 51.3 45.1 3.6 2023 0.07 543,484 51.1 45.2 3.7 2024 0.07 510,831 50.9 45.4 3.6 2025 0.07 485,229 51.2 45.2 3.6 King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4...... d5: popularity by time control Format Share % Games White win % Black win % Draw % Sharpness bullet 0.04 973,999 50.2 47.4 2.4 0.976 blitz 0.07 2,653,884 51.0 45.4 3.6 0.964 rapid 0.07 746,076 52.8 43.4 3.9 0.961 King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4...... d5: top candidate moves by rating bracket Rating (Elo) 1st move 1st % 2nd move 2nd % 3rd move 3rd % 400 exd5 26.1 e5 19.7 Nc3 18.2 1000 exd5 35.6 e5 24.7 Nc3 13.3 1200 exd5 46.2 e5 27.5 Nc3 8.7 1400 exd5 55.1 e5 29.3 Nc3 4.8 1600 exd5 61.5 e5 29.3 Nc3 2.5 1800 exd5 66.6 e5 27.7 Nc3 1.8 2000 exd5 70.4 e5 25.6 Nc3 1.6 2200 exd5 80.7 e5 16.9 Nc3 1.1 2500 exd5 91.7 e5 6.8 Nc3 0.9 King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4...... d5: top practitioners by side Side Player Games White Joseph G Gallagher 8 White Mark L Hebden 7 White Richard S Jones 6 Black Timothy J Upton 6 Black Boris Alexander Latzke 5 Black Stefan Walter 5
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4... d5?
The King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4... d5 begins with 1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 d5 and is classified under ECO code C36. Black attacks the e4 pawn for initiative and easier development overall than White.
Is the King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4... d5 good for beginners?
The King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4... d5 can be played at any level. Beginners should focus on understanding the key strategic ideas rather than memorizing long theoretical lines. Our AI bots at various rating levels provide a great way to practice the opening concepts.
What are the win rates for the King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4... d5?
In a database of 3,399,960 master games, White wins 51.4% of the time, Black wins 45%, and 3.7% are drawn. Notable players on the White side include Joseph G Gallagher and Mark L Hebden. On the Black side, Timothy J Upton and Boris Alexander Latzke are among the most frequent practitioners.
How can I practice the King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4... d5?
On Chessiverse, you can practice the King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4... d5 by playing against our 600+ AI bots. Each bot has a unique playing style and opening repertoire, so you can find the perfect sparring partner for any level.
Related Openings
Evans Gambit
Evans Gambit: 4.b4 sacrifices a wing pawn for fast development and a powerful c3-d4 centre. White scores 52.7% across 5.8M games. Play vs. AI on Chessiverse.
Evans Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3...... Ba5
Evans Accepted 5...Ba5: most principled retreat, keeps eye on c3. White builds the d4 centre and launches an attack. 1.5M games. Play vs. AI on Chessiverse.
King's Gambit
King's Gambit (2.f4): the great romantic gambit. Pawn sacrificed for open lines and a direct king hunt from move three. Play vs. AI on Chessiverse.
King's Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4...... 3.Nf3
King's Knight Gambit: 3.Nf3 stops ...Qh4+ and prepares to recover the f4 pawn. The principled main line, 30M games of theory. Play vs. AI on Chessiverse.
Reviewed by
IM John BartholomewCo-Founder & Chess Educator
International Master and chess educator. Co-founded Chessable and joined Chessiverse as co-founder. Best known for his "Climbing the Rating Ladder" YouTube series and structured opening courses.
Practice This Opening on Chessiverse
Play against 1000+ AI bots with unique personalities and opening repertoires. From beginner-friendly to grandmaster-level opponents, find the perfect sparring partner for any opening.
Play Now
Not sure which opening fits you? Take the free chess personality test — your style determines which openings will work with you.
Back to Articles
How to apply
To apply for this job you need to authorize on our website. If you don't have an account yet, please register.
Post a resumeSimilar jobs
Customer Service Trainer - KSA Residence
Tabby | تابي,
Remote
4 hours ago
Department: Customer Support OpsEmployment Type: Full TimeLocation: KSACompensation: ر.س9,000 - ر.س17,000 / monthDescriptionWe are looking for a Customer Service Trainer & Quality Specialist to join our team in KSA. The ideal candidate will be fluent in Arabic and English and have a strong understanding of customer service principles, best practices, and the cultural nuances of the GCC region.In this role,...
Inspector
GE Vernova,
Remote
1 day ago
Job Description SummaryJob DescriptionSummary: We are seeking a motivated and detail-oriented individual to join our Rotor Department as Quality Inspector. This position offers a unique opportunity to launch your career at GE Vernova by gaining hands-on experience in the quality verification of gas turbine rotors and related components. Under the mentorship of experienced professionals, you will assist in ensuring that...
Chief Executive Director
Confidential Government,
Remote
4 days ago
Job DescriptionThe Chief Executive Director (CED) is the strategic and operational leader of the organization, responsible for the development, implementation, and management of organizational strategies that align with the organization's mission and vision. The CED will engage with a diverse range of stakeholders, including board members, staff, and external partners, to create a culture of excellence, innovation, and accountability. Leveraging...
